Why was my post deleted?: November 2009

Posted on October 30th.

http://whedonesque.com/comments/22211

Fell foul of our no self linking rule.

Posted around Halloween:

http://whedonesque.com/comments/22180

As fun as these puzzles are, they're not provoking much debate (if any). And I think by now people are well aware of them without needing another heads up about them on the front page.

It's cute but a tweet like this isn't really front page news.

This kind of thing isn't really front page news.

Added to the preceding promo pics thread.

Original entry still on the front page

http://whedonesque.com/comments/22459

Originally posted back in March of last year.

http://whedonesque.com/comments/15667

One Buffy quiz on the front page is more than enough.

Nope. He really isn't.

And now for a more detailed explanation as to why this was pulled:

Discussion about religion as well as politics in the context of the Whedonverse can be a bit heated but it is usually quite amicable at Whedonesque. Unfortunately though, discussion about articles about Christian fundamentalists such as the Hollywood Reporter one never ends well.

Already on the front page.

Linking to scans is against our rules.

At the rate the site clicks over with new stories these days, I'm gonna say that this news is just a wee bit too marginal for a front-page entry.

Going once, going twice! Posted earlier in the week.

http://whedonesque.com/comments/22391

It's a week away and this was just a vague hint that there's something Buffy related in the episode. Let's wait and see if there's something more link-worthy closer to the air date.

An io9 article which largely consists of comments made at Whedonesque.

The most recent ARG thread is still pretty active and I see this new information has already been posted in a comment there.

We're a blog not a message board.

An article which seemed to be made up entirely of comments made at Whedonesque.

No objection to decent criticism of the show, but we draw the line at actor bashing.

See previous deletion.

Lovely but we feature HiJinks the other week and we're always weary of webcomics doing this sort of thing just to get hits from dear old Whedonesque.

There's already one 2012 review on the front page, this link will get added to it.

Unless it's an interview with Jane or James, Caprica features like this aren't really relevant for the front page.

Seemed more like an excuse to bash actresses than anything else.

Posted on the 2nd of this month.

http://whedonesque.com/comments/22239

What with the high turn over in front page items today, this unfortunately doesn't really stand out as an item on its own.

What with the cancellation, we're trying to keep the front page from getting overloaded. And stuff like this will always get the chop first.

The schedule is already linked to on the cancellation thread.

This video has been discussed on the front page before.

Posted 2nd by a bare minute . . .

Double Rossum posted (rossi?)

It's not really saying anything new and it's again with the meta-esque (see previous entry).

For reasons of space, links relating to non-Joss projects need to have a clear focus on the Whedon connection (an interview with Jewel, or a promotional picture of her, in this instance, would do). This was just a rather generic-looking film poster, which doesn't quite cut it for the front page.

Same material and quotes that were posted in a different interview yesterday (conference call?).

http://whedonesque.com/comments/22274

It's a bit meta-esque.

We would only really do ratings threads for premieres of non-Joss shows these days (i.e. those that star Whedonverse actors).

Fell foul of our no self-linking rule.

Posted yesterday, still on the front page.

No link and this news was posted and deleted the other week.

Yes it's really him but it's not really relevant to discussion here.

No Whedon (related) mention in the article.

Combined this io9 list with the previous io9 entry to save front-page space

Monday, November 30, 2009

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Friday, November 20, 2009

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Monday, November 16, 2009

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Friday, November 13, 2009

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Monday, November 9, 2009

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Friday, November 6, 2009

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Monday, November 2, 2009